iLoyal – Apple Users Tend to Be More Brand Loyal


Apple should love their iPhone users.  They should call them every once in a while to say hi, tell them that they’re appreciated.  Why is this?  Because iPhone users, typically very ardent in their love or obsession with their smartphones, drive sales and spend money.  A survey by AdMob found that while iPhone and Android users usually spend the same amount of time using apps, iPhone users are more likely to buy them.  In fact, half of all iPhone users and 35 pecent of Touch owners buy at least one app a month, far more than Palm or Android users.  But this is not the only way that Apple is capitalizing on their iPhone users.

iPhone users have the highest customer satisfaction rates and nearly all would recommend the smartphone to their friends.  Beyond this, though, they will help drive sales of Apple’s newly launched iPad.  AdMob also found that about 16 percent of iPhone users expressed strong interest in purchasing an iPad.  While 16 percent may not sound huge – what about those other 84 percent? – it can translate into sales exceeding 12 million units.

Apple has strong brand loyalty, as you can see with diehard Mac fans.  AdMob also found that about a quarter of iPhone users said they were considering an iPod Touch purchase.  This little device, while not able to make calls, has been tremendously popular as a mobile internet device and mp3 player, winning over fans with its great versatility.   They’re hoping this loyalty will extend to the new iPad, and it just may.

A survey by ChangeWave research found that 13 percent of their respondents were “somewhat” or “very likely” to purchase an iPad.  A similar study was conducted prior to the iPhone’s 2007 launch; only 9 percent of respondents wanted an iPhone.  That bit of good news was bolstered by another stat:  in 2007, more than a quarter of respondents were turned off by the iPhone’s price.  The 2010 survey finds that 8 percent found the iPad’s price to be excessive.

Analyst Mike Abramsky of RBC Capital Markets, which commissioned the survey, says, “While we do not expect feverish initial launch lines like the iPhone, the data portends well for healthy initial iPad uptae.  This data, while preliminary, suggests iPad may have greater potential than expected….”   Abramsky is predicting Apple will sell about 5 million iPads this year, taking in $2.4 billion.

And it is important to remember that it took the Touch and the iPhone a little while to catch on.  According to Morgan Stanley research, it took about two years for the Touch to “pick up steam.”  After that, they become the “fastest adapted gadget ever.”    Apple is looking to work their magic once again with the iPad.  We’ll see if it works.

More Music News from Around the Web Today . . .

DEVO DEVO Inc. Conducts Focus Group To Choose Ideal Color For New DEVO Brand

10 Billionth Song Sold By iTunes Is Johnny Cash But Black Eyed Peas Hold No. 1 Spot

Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers – “Good Enough”

?uestlove Speaks on Fela and His Music

Warner Music Group and Free Streaming Services

Edgar Bronfman leaves little doubt about Warmer Music Group’s continued relationship with free music streaming sites.  He says that sites that allow people to access music for free are “clearly not positive for the industry.”  Bronfman adds, “The ‘get all your music you want for free, and then maybe with a few bells and whistles we can move you to a premium price strategy’, is not the kind of approach to business that we will be supporting in the future.”

Streaming sites like the European Spotify, for instance, clearly dislike WMG’s stance because it would keep them from offering artists represented by WMG, including Michael Buble, REM, Madonna, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Enya, and Muse, to online listeners.  The blogosphere and music reporting industry doesn’t like it much either.  According to this piece is TechDirt, entitled, “Warner Music Shoots Self In Head:  Says No More Free Streaming:”

“You don’t compete with “free” by taking your ball and going home. You don’t compete with “free” by pretending that old artificial scarcities are coming back after the wall has been broken down. You don’t compete with “free” by suing customers. You don’t compete with “free” by shunning those who have business models that work. You compete with free by offering a better product and a better business model. WMG is choosing to go in the other direction.”


WMG is also facing criticism within its own ranks.  One of their top-selling bands, Muse, is voicing their disapproval of the move to end licensing for free streaming sites.  Chris Wolstenholme, Muse’s bassist, said in an interview with BBC Newsbeat,

It’s like taking your song off the radio, isn’t it?  The corporations are setting the rules on these things because they’re clutching at straws.  They’ve lost so much money on record sales because of the internet.  As far as bands are concerned, you just want people to hear your music whichever way they can.”

It is interesting to note that 35 percent of WMG’s revenue is from digital music sales.  Digital revenue increased 8 percent to $184 million, while declining CD sales are largely to blame for their $17 million loss in the first quarter.   Is their move to end licensing for free sites, which are tremendously popular, akin to shooting themselves in the head, as DirtTech says?  If digital sales are ever more important for their bottom line, why alienate the people who are most likely to buy the music?  TechDirt writes, “Warner Music just told the one thing that was effectively competing with unauthorized downloads to shove off.  Brilliant.”

More Music News From Around the Web . . .

Video: Sony’s Hesse At Digital Music East

Harlem, Dante vs. Zombies: Concert Review and Photos

Progress Report: Antony & The Johnsons

Georgia Anne Muldrow “Roses” Live @ SOBs

Those Bad Bloggers

Someone has been waiting for years to use the word, “musicblogocide,” and that person is fulfilling his dream today.   According to, “In what is being referred to as the Musicblogocide of 2010, Google has deleted at least half a dozen popular music blogs that they claim violated copyright law which were hosted on Google’s Blogger and Blogspot services.”  A good move?  Something to keep in mind is that popular blogs sway opinion and can point consumers to an artist.

Google has targeted copyright violating bloggers who make it easy for readers to download free mp3s or who post videos without the proper licensing from the music labels.  But is that really the case?  One of the bloggers who was deleted said that he’d been encouraged to post new songs by the music labels themselves – who then filed copyright violation charges against him.  So, the cynics would say, they’ve had their free publicity, maybe a few sales, and suddenly now are opposed to the postings.

There is also a problem because of the vagueness of the charges against these bloggers.  Google says, “When we receive multiple DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) complaints about the same blog, and have no indication that the offending content is being used in an authorised manner, we will remove the blog. [If] this is the result of miscommunication by staff at the record label, or confusion over which MP3s are ‘official’ … it is imperative that you file a DMCA counter-claim so we know you have the right to the music in question.”  DMCA complaints are notoriously vague and don’t specify what the actual infringements are.

One of the blogs deleted by Google is I Rock Cleveland.  Blogger Bill Lipold told The Plain Dealer, a Cleveland newspaper, “It’s difficult to get across…that there’s a difference between someone working with the blessings of the artists and labels and someone who leaks Bruce Springsteen’s entire discography.  They don’t see the distinction between someone who’s adding value and someone who’s facilitating piracy.  That goes to the root of this whole mess.”  Lipold’s been unsuccessful in convincing Google of this.

The Twitter response has been swift, with one user writing, “I say we boycott @Google and start using Bing. Doesn’t everyone know BLOGGER sucks anyway?”

The blogs deleted also had their entire archives deleted, which was months or even years of work that had attained good search engine rankings.  Now, if they do choose to start somewhere else, they’re starting from scratch.  Music piracy is serious, but are these bloggers the problem?  Or were they helping drive sales?

Other Music News From Around the Web Today . . .

The Fate of a Format: Will MusicDNA Catch On?

Frank Zappa’s Movie: The Freak Out List

Check out the new Dios Iphone App

Georgia Anne Muldrow & Declaime “fOnk w/ an O” feat. LMNO

AudioMicro Partners With Flixtime – Create FREE Music Videos From Your Photos

royalty free music

AudioMicro is pleased to announce a new partnership with Flixtime, an exciting new take on creating online videos and slideshows. Flixtime users can create custom, production-quality videos and slideshows in just 3 easy steps. AudioMicro provides the sonic backbone to the project, providing sound effects and production music to cover every genre and aesthetic imaginable.

The platform is simple enough that your average computer user can have a great time while creating impressive slideshows and videos all without ever navigating away from the Flextime site or having any need to use external software. The videos can be up to 60 seconds in length and feature a dazzling array of visual effects options.

Don’t have your own pictures or video but want to create anyway?…not a problem. By including Fotolia’s stock photo library, Flixtime offers even a camera-less creative the ability to create stunning slideshows and videos from the comfort of their own desk/home. Pick your favorite pics from the Fotolia library, select the perfect royalty free music tracks and sound effects to accompany the images from AudioMicro’s award winning library and voila, you just became a video producer!

The platform is well rounded, the creation process is simple and the access is limited only by one’s ability to get in front of a computer with an internet connection. So basically, everyone wins. Check it out at

That’s True Love: Couple Says iDo

Do you love your partner more than your iPhone?  Let’s hope so.  A couple from New York said their vows at a Fifth Avenue Apple Store.  Josh and Ting Li met there, and love bloomed app style.  They married on Valentine’s Day, their rings attached to iPhones – first gens, your choice for wedding apparel.  They wrote their vows on Letterpress cards, vowing to love each other even more than their iPhones.  The final touch was the jeans and black turtleneck clad minister ala Steve Jobs who read the ceremony from a white 3Gen iPhone.

During the minister’s ceremony, he invoked the name of the almighty.  Not God, but Steve Jobs.   Quote a Jobs’ speech, he said, “said: “You have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future. You have to trust in something — your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever. This approach has never let me down.”  Good for Josh and Ting.

Whose idea was the Apple store wedding?  Isn’t that what every little girl dreams of?  Ting suggested it.  Says her hubby:  “We got to know each other because Ting was looking to buy an iPod…I used to joke that the Apple store is my church.  Ting then came up with the idea of having the wedding there.”

Josh and Ting came into the Apple store – wedding dress, wedding party, the whole deal – at midnight on February 14, much to the amazement of customers at the 24 hour store.  Perhaps the first couple ever to get married in an Apple store, the Lis aren’t the first to look to the iPhone for help when it comes to wedded bliss.

Meridian, LLC, for instance, has recently launched America’s first Tuxedo App.  This allows grooms (or their brides) to choose from a comprehensive selection of colors and brand name tuxedo styles for their big day.  The geo-locator will find the closest dealers in your area, who you can then call.  You can also email your partner with your selections for approval.

There are tons of apps to help brides and grooms get ready for the big day, including iWed.  This handy app helps you plan your wedding, track details, manage your guest list, and much more.  iBridal Gown is another favorite.  This allows brides to shop for a dress “like a pro.”  The WedLink helps you announce your impending nuptials to your friends (better than announcing on Facebook?), as well as find services that you’ll need for the big day.  You can check these all out at the App store.

More Music News From Around the Web Today . . .

Sellaband Files For Bankruptcy

Gorillaz New Single Stylo in Two Versions

Feist – “He Was Free” (Live At 2010 Cultural Olympiad)

The Icarus Line – “We Sick / Holy Man” free single

tabi Bonney “Fever” feat. Raheem DeVaughn

Will Free Work?

As we’ve seen with Spotify’s struggle to get itself launched in the US, imeem’s demise, and Lala’s fire sale acquisition by Apple, free music streaming sites don’t have the most successful track record.  But Free All Music and Guvera are tackling that problem – and maybe they’ll even succeed.  The Associated Press has reported that the two companies are going to rely on bigger advertising dollars to get by.

Both Free All Music and Guvera have lured advertisers that will pay more $2 for a minute of airtime on their sites.  According to the AP, this will make them about the same amount of revenue as they would get if they charged your $1.29 for a download.

Successful services like Pandora allow free usage that is sponsored by ads.  Their premium packages are ad-free for paid subscribers.  Free All Music and Guvera are asking for a moment of your time in exchange for free services.  Free All Music’s CEO Richard Nailling says, “You pay for the song by paying attention to the advertiser.  It’s a fair trade of attention for music.”  And no quiz, so you can kind of zone in and out if you want.

What has kept other free sites from working is the crippling licensing fees they must pay (sites usually pay licensing fees of about 70 percent per song downloaded, which has been unsustainable with free sites).  The advertising money doesn’t cover it.  Free All Music and Guvera have signed with Universal Music Group, EMI, and two indie labels (Sony hasn’t signed on yet).  With the bump to $2 ads, this may help keep these two services afloat.

Some advantages the sites are offering music listeners, in exchange for a moment before each free song, is that they can play their downloads on any device, they don’t have to check back in with the service to keep their songs from expiring (as was the case with SpiralFrog), and everything is much more controlled.  How so?  Right now, both companies are in testing phases.  If you want to join, you have to register.  You’ll be placed on a waiting list.  During that time, the sites determine if there is enough advertisers to pay for the projected amount of downloads, and if there is, you’re in.

Claes Loberg, Guvera’s founder and CEO, says, “Everything’s about a controlled, sort of old-school business model of: build one product, find one customer, sell it.  Then build to products, find two customers, and sell it…If we have enough to support a million people, that’s all we’ll open the door to, even if we have 5 million sitting in the background waiting to get in.”  Rather than having X amount of ad dollars and YYYYY amount of customers demanding songs, which has led the previous free streaming model to combust.

So how do these two sites manage to attract higher advertising dollars?  They help the ads target consumers.  When you go on Free All Music, for instance, you are given a choice of advertisers, from Coke to  You can select on retailer’s ad to view.  Then, you get your song. You can download it, it’s yours. You’ve paid with a minute of your life – not bad if you like the song.  You get a max of five songs per week, which is reset each Tuesday.

At Guvera, you fill out a profile, which includes info on your favorites from any number of categories (favorite foods, music, shampoo, whatever).   This allows advertisers to target you based on your interests – but you do get credits to spend on music.  Then, it works like Free All Music. You select on advertiser, watch the ad, then get your song.

More Music News From Around the Web Today . . .

The Orchard Ups Navin From Interim To Full CEO

Dios, The Henry Clay People, Signals: Concert Review and Photos

The New Pornographers – “Your Hands (Together)”

Buddyhead Gossip #133: Keith is off booze, Axl Rose looks like Rip Taylor, Flamers and someone needs to stop Ke$ha!

Daniel Merriweather “Red” Live on Letterman

What’s Up with Pandora?

We’ve been hearing a lot about the downtrodden online music streaming services like imeem, the struggling MySpace Music, or the not-even-launched American Spotify.  So what’s happened to Pandora, one of the original services, whose goal is to “play only the music you’ll love”?  In the midst of all this financial and licensing trouble for streaming services, Pandora’s actually gaining ground, and has had its first profitable quarter ever last year.  How are they doing this?

First, a bit about Pandora.  Their Music Genome Project is an intensive analysis of songs: their team of musician-analysts listen to each song, study its details – each song takes about 30 minutes to fully listen and record these unique (and numerous – they’ll record up to 400 different details in one song) attributes.   You enter in the name of a song or artist, and Pandora generates a list of songs with similar attributes.  With about 100 years of music to choose from, and the ability to create 100 different stations personalized to you.  Pandora has taken its meticulous analysis and has doubled its subscription base to 40 million users, according to CNN.

They’ve made deals that have expanded their reach, including one with Apple, have sought out more higher-paying advertisers, and have brought in $50 million in revenue.   Their iPhone app allows listeners to use the service anywhere, anytime, which appeals to both those who already use and those who want to increase the options for mobile listening.  They add about 35,000 iPhone subscribers everyday.  Says Tim Westergren, Pandora’s founder, “Access is our holy grail.”

One problem that all online music streaming sites face is licensing fees.  This crippled imeem, Lala, and other sites, and has threatened to sink Pandora in the past as well.  Westergren has called royalty fees an “albatross.”   The albatross grows heavier as Pandora gets more popular.  $30 million of their $50 million in revenue went to royalty payments.  You can almost here the meter ticking every hour, can’t you?

Pandora finally got a break last year, when they reached an agreement with royalty collector, SoundExchange, to lower their fees.  Westergren says, “The silver lining of our battle over royalties is that [the music industry] came to know our business, and they’re getting to understand that we’re good for them.  Like terrestrial radio, we’re fundamentally a promotional device for music…but we’re an enormous, targeted promotional machine.”

Sonal Gandhi, Forrester Research music media analyst says, “Pandora now has a sustainable business model,” something which other streaming sites lack.  “It was quite a struggle at the beginning when royalties were very high and when they were reluctant to place ads on their site.  They realized they had to do more to make money, and now they’re getting the hang of it.”  And even with those occasional ads, Forrester finds that Pandora users aren’t leaving the site.  A good bit of news in the music streaming world.

More Music News From Around the Web Today . . .

Camper Van Beethoven Asks Fans For $7,000 To Sponsor SXSW Trip

Liars Music Video: Scissor

Caribou – “Odessa” Video

Jay Electronica Live @ The Jazz Cafe in London

App Olympics

It’s been a busy month for sports: the Super Bowl, which is the most watched single-day sports event (though more than half watch for the commercials) crowned the Saints champions, and shortly after the Vancouver Olympic Games began.  iPhone was there for both big events with multiple apps.  The Super Bowl had 16 or so apps, including a countdown calendar, official game program, and the popular A+ Super Bowl Commercials.  Let’s take a look at the offerings for the Olympics.

  • NBC Olympics (free).  This was a favorite of ZDNet.  For those away from the TV or who just want to cut to the chase and see the results, the NBC Olympics app has real-time updates on every event, real-time results, schedules, video clips, highlights, news stories, and a medal count.  It links up with Facebook and Twitter so you can follow everything you want.
  • 2010Guide – Vancouver 2010 Olympic Winter Games: The Official Mobile Spectator Guide (free). Hurry.  The Olympics will be over by the time you finish reading that catchy title.  The app is great for those who are actually at the Olympics because it has a “location aware schedule.”  You can create your own itinerary, and the app will let you know what events are going on close to your current location.  Those at home can get real-time results for every sport, news, photos, and Twitter streams.
  • Olympic Games and Sports Rules and Records (free). This is handy for non-sport folk who want to follow the Olympics, or really, for sports fans who have never watched curling before.  It has a glossary of sports terms and equipment for scores of different sports, as well as records for every summer and winter Games “ever held.”  Back to the Greeks?  As you can probably tell, this app is a bit heavy on the text, but it reviews very well with iTunes users.
  • Cowbell 2010 ($0.99).  For a buck, you can rink alpine cowbells to cheer your favorite team and/or country.  The bells are covered in your choice of national flags – good way to show your national pride.  And cowbells never really go out of style.  You can also organize events schedules, create a favorite events folder, and follow your faves on Twitter.
  • NBC Olympics Cheer (free).  Last noise-making one, promise.  You can get the old cowbell, as well as an air horn, whistle, or USA! Crowd cheer.  Fun anytime of year, in fact.
  • Games.  The Olympics Games also have their share of game apps.  You can curl, ski jump, and snowboard for free with Lite Versions or from $0.99 to $2.99.

Get going, you only have until February 28.

More Music News From Around The Web Today . . .

A2IM To Hold Social Media Seminars In NYC & Austin

John Mellencamp For Senator?

Vampire Weekend Cast Jake Gyllenhaal, Joe Jonas, RZA, and Lil Jon In Next Video

The Future of Rock Band

Jimi Hendrix may join artists like The Beatles, Pearl Jam, and Green Day who have their own dedicated Rock Band games, Janie Hendrix, his stepsister, revealed to the LA Times.  The article read, “At the time the deal was completed, Sony vowed to make his music ‘available through every type of media’—including a new edition of Rock Band that Janie Hendrix says should appear before the end of this year.”

This year marks the 40th anniversary of Hendrix’s death, and in March, Sony is putting out a collection of studio recordings.  A game could be the perfect complement to this.  As this is being announced, however, Viacom president and CEO Phillippe Dauman issued a statement that throws Rock Band’s future somewhat into question.  He said,

“As we go forward, we are continuing to focus more on software than hardware, looking to reduce the cost structure associated with Rock Band, being selective in the music titles we choose for Rock Band based on their cost.  The music industry will assist with this category to make sure that it can continue on a profitable basis in the future and then finally we think we have the best games in the category, we’ll continue to rollout exciting products.”


Dauman’s comments were aimed at music labels, such as Warner Music Group.  Dauman feels that Rock Band contributed to the music industry by not only getting the license revenues from Viacom, but also increased exposure for the labels’ artists and potentially more downloads of their music.  But complicating that assertion is the fact that 66 percent of 2009’s decline in video game sales was from music games.    Viacom already relies on low license fees in order to keep their “games division alive,” according to Billboard.

WMG president Edgar Bronfman thinks that the fees are already too low – “paltry” was his choice of words.  WMG and Harmonix, creator of Rock Band, have failed to reach any new agreements this year, casting doubt on the future of WMG music in future Rock Band editions.  Viacom has indicated that if lower fees are not forthcoming, they will be forced to get their music from other sources and exclude that from Warner.

This won’t affect the Jimi Hendrix game because his music is controlled by Sony, but it could affect what we’ll see in the future.

More Music News From Around the Web Today . . .

Seth Godin: The Exponential Power Of Viral

SXSW 2010 Announces Complete Schedule With Venues

Thee Silver Mt. Zion Memorial Orchestra – “I Built Myself A Metal Bird” Video (Stereogum Premiere)


Leela James “Tell Me You Love Me”

Apple Markups

When you buy a product like a DVD or CD, a small portion of the overall cost goes to the artists’ and writers’ royalties (though that’s by far the smallest portion of the overall take); the rest is for the retailers and the labels.  The disc itself is remarkably cheap.  It’s a bit different with consumer electronics, where the cost of the components is much higher.  Business Week has an interesting piece about the markets for the most popular gadgets, and for some, it is surprisingly small.  Let’s take a look at what Business Week found.

You’d think the iPhone would have a pretty big markup because, well, it can.  The popular G3 and G3S retail for about $200 each.  The 3G has about $175 in components while the 3GS has about $180 worth of fancy electronics.   For the iPhone 3GS, for instance, there are upgrades, such as the 32 gig memory, improved 3 mp camera, and new Samsung applications chip, that are costly for Apple.  Don’t worry about Apple being too altruistic and offering their awesome phones at almost-cost: they get a subsidy from AT&T, and their total profit for the 3G is about 55 percent.

What about iPhone rival, Nexus One?  This one retails starting at $170 and has $174 worth of electronics components.  But the “starting at” price is from T-Mobile USA, which sells the phone with a 2 year contract.  You can also get the unlocked version from Google, but that’ll cost you a much larger $529.  Verizon may be getting on the Nexus wagon soon and selling the phone with one of their plans.  In that case, the price should be comparable to T-Mobile’s.

It’s the same story with the Motorola Droid: it retails for $200, a markup of less than $20 over the cost of components with a contract from Verizon.  Contract free will cost you $600.

Bigger markups can be seen on items like the iPod Shuffle and the Amazon Kindle 2.    The Kindle costs about $186 to produce, and Amazon sells it for $359 – no wireless carrier to defray the cost there.  Likewise with the tiny Shuffle.  This whole unit costs about $22 to make, including the packaging.  It retails for a little more than twice that.  The iPad also has some big markups: the entry-level model costs $500 and has $220 worth of electronics, while the 3G 64 gig higher-end model costs $829 with $335 worth of cool iPad stuff.

It’s always nice to know what you’re getting, and not getting, for your money.

More Music News From Around The Web . . .

EMI To Sell The Beatles’ Abbey Road Studios

Haunting The Chapel No. 6

Give Back Your iPod – but You Can Have a Sticker

If you have a child in school, you know that the coolest thing that you ever get is homework sheets, maybe a left-over cookie from a Valentine’s Day party.  If your kid is in high school, you get nothing, maybe some glares or exasperated sighs.  A school in Polk County, Florida, had a better plan: an iPod.  Parents were offered a free iPod – not even a Shuffle, a Nano worth $150, to parents of children on IEPs (Individual Education Plans for Special Education students) who filled out a survey.  But now, the big bad Florida Department of Education is saying no to the iPod.  Apparently the money will be used for “classroom instruction and curriculum,” or other such nonsense.

The Polk County School District received federal money and set aside as much as $350,000 to give the iPods to the parents of 10,500 IEP students.  The Department of Ed said that they could not carry out their plan because the money has to be used directly for children.  The goal, says Polk County School District Superintendent Gail McKinzie, was to download educational information on the iPods for parents.  “The intent was to have parent training.”  But she added about the state’s decision, “They’re right, we’re wrong.”

Polk County schools are struggling to have adequate parental involvement, which is one of the requirements to get funding from the Individuals with Disabilities Act, and thought this would be a good way to get parents to participate in the survey.  One of the school board members, Dick Mullenax said, “This one was just a well-intentioned method to get parents involved but it just slipped through the cracks.  That was a lot of money.  It has rightfully been reconsidered and changed.”

US Rep Adam Putnam, R-Bartow, said “I was taken aback when I read about it in the paper.  Giving an iPod in exchange for a few questions being answered certainly is extravagant in these tough times.  These programs are important to disabled students, and there is a survey requirement for the funds, but wouldn’t doughnuts and coffee work?”

Why don’t they get the schools a whole bunch of iPads instead?  One of the niche markets that the iPad is ideal for is education and would perhaps be a better use of $350,000.  And coffee and doughnuts for their parents – from a fund, of course.

Other Music News From Around the Web . . .

Guys Hands Wants To Break Up EMI

NO CANCER! Benefit: Review and Photos

“Hole” Play Jonathan Ross

The Soft Pack – “C’mon” music video

Keelay, The Park & Jesse Boykins III “Crash My Hard Drive”

Spotify in US?

Spotify is an immensely popular ad-supported music streaming site has been long awaited by Americans.  Currently, it is offered only in Europe, and a Warner Music Group announcement could spell trouble for Spotify in the States.  Warner Music Group’s CEO Edgar Bronfman said that his company is through with free music.  This won’t affect the European version of Spotify, as Spotify spokesman, Jim Butcher.  “WMG is not pulling out of its current agreement with Spotify in Europe,” and will continue to allow their music to be streamed from the site.  But what about the future of the American version?

WMG recently lost a nice chunk of change when imeem went bankrupt.  They had invested $16 million into the now-defunct ad-supported streaming site.  The reason for imeem’s demise is the heavy cost of licensing fees.  It seems clear that WMG doesn’t want to sink more money into a business model that they are convinced doesn’t work.  And they don’t want to cut into their sales.  WMG doesn’t want to license music for sites that will become a listener’s primary source of music.  And without Warner, it’s possible that Spotify won’t be crossing the pond.

Spotify could launch a limited version, with no WMG licensed songs, or create a different subscription model.  Bronfman said he could see “hundreds of millions if not billions of people, most of whom are not today either buyers or certainly heavy buyers of music” paying for a music subscription.  In that case, WMG would be on board.

The problem for Spotify is how to offer a service like the one that is very popular in Europe but not alienate the music licensing groups.  It works in Europe, according to Wired, because Spotify offers free music and then turns to listeners to buy great smartphone apps.

Experts don’t believe that will work in the US.   They may have to cap the number of songs a listener can access so they can afford the licensing fees without going into debt.  The Wired article says, “Spotify must now negotiate a delicate balancing act that pleases both record labels and users, two groups whose interests have not historically been aligned. Whatever the result, the Spotify we see here likely won’t be identical to the one fans have enjoyed in Europe for over a year.”

More Music News From Around the Web . . .

NYC, D.C., Philly: Georgia Anne Muldrow & Declaime Live

Cold Cave Ticket Giveaway

Pattern Is Movement – “Light Of The World”

Alexander McQueen and Lady Gaga Connected With Bad Romance

RealNetworks Q4 Losses Top 13.3 Million

Apps that Matter

There is an app for everything, and a lot of it is inane – Rate a Fart, iPickUpLines, and Wooo! Button are three that come to mind and make us question the future of the human race.  But there are also a lot of helpful apps, as we saw with the journalist who used his iPhone first aid app to treat his wounds and stay calm after being trapped by the destruction of Haiti’s recent earthquake.  Apps For All has issued a new app that is specifically designed to help caretakers of Alzheimer’s patients, and anything that can help these dedicated family members, friends, or health care workers is worth exponentially more than the 99 cent price.

What does Apps For All’s new iPhone app do?  It helps caregivers find reliable, helpful apps.  According to a press release, “the apps recommended by Alzheimer’s Apps include those that calm, lift spirits, and engage persons with Alzheimer’s or other forms of dementia….We eliminate the need for you to search all over the App Store and spend money on apps that may not be useful to your particular health care needs.”

With Alzheimer’s Apps, you can review recommended apps and read ratings and reviews.  You can also post reviews and rate apps.  You can buy this app for your iPod or iTouch for 99 cents.  You can also get Apps for All’s Healthful Apps app, which gives you all eight of their healthcare categories, including Alzheimer’s Apps, for $3.

This app is helpful because finding the app you want and that will be most helpful can be time-consuming and difficult in the 150,000 app App Store.  As the press release states, this app saves time and money, allowing caretakers to focus on more important matters.  And perhaps takes a tiny bit of stress out of their day as well.

You can search the Apple Store for this and more useful apps.  Among all the silly, fun, inane, and just plain stupid apps, it is nice that there are some that are designed to help people and make a difference.

Music News From Around the Web Today . . .

Spotify Says It’s Still Feeling WMG Love

Madonna Impresses Possible Candidate For Brazil’s Presidency

Velvet Davenport – “Get Out” (Feat. Ariel Pink & Gary War)

Putting the Hi in Ohio

Tanya Morgan & Kooley High – High Fidelity Tour

Royalty Decision for Men at Work

“Down Under” was a huge song in the 80s, and it is making news again.  The owner of the rights to that song, Larrikin Music, sued Men at Work, saying their 80s classic infringed on their copyrights.  They own the rights to “Kookaburra Sits in the Gum Tree,” and say that Men at Work used part of their melody without clearance.

And Australian Federal Court judge Peter Jacobsen decided last week that Larrikin was right.  At issue was a flute riff that appears in “Down Under” three separate times.  Interestingly, it wasn’t Larrikin’s sense of injustice that led to this lawsuit – it was a quiz show.

Spicks and Specks, a trivia show, asked contestants to name the folksong that could be heard in “Down Under.”  Kookaburra was the answer, and Larrikin Managing Director Norman Lurie said, “Hey, yeah, that does sound familiar.” (Or so we can conjecture).   And thus started the three year battle that culminated in Judge Jacobsen finding for Larrikin.

Judge Jacobsen said, “I would emphasize that the findings I have made do not amount to a finding that the flute riff is a substantial part of Down Under or that it is the “hook” of that song.”  If it were, the damages paid by Men at Work could be much more substantial.

CNN reported on the story and quoted Daniel Mullensiefen, co-director of the masters program at Music, Mind, and Brain at London’s Goldsmiths University, as saying, “There’s a lot more to “Down Under” than that flute melody.  It’s not the main melody and  not the main hook and I suppose that in the end will mean that it will be a minor share of the royalties that this publisher can claim now.”

According to Men at Work, the reference to Kookaburra was “completely innocuous.”  Songwriters Colin Hay and Ron Strykert say that the flute riff wasn’t even in the original song, that they wrote it for acoustic guitar and they play it that way today.  Larrikin bought the rights to the song for $6100 and is now seeking 40 to 60 percent of Men at Works’ royalties from the song.

Tom Service had this to say on his blog on the Guardian’s website, “If that kind of micro-sampling is to become the subject of court cases the world over, no song that has ever been released is safe.”  If Larrikin is entitled to royalties, the statute of limitations has run out so they will not receive any royalties from the 80s or 90s, when the song was wildly popular.

More Music News From Around the Web . . .

Copyright Law vs. Art As A Shared Experience

Poll: Who Is The Best Band Picked For Bonnaroo?

Eluvium – “The Motion Makes Me Last” Video

New Roky Erickson record soon + Youtube toy store weirdness

Kidz In The Hall “Jukebox”

Because You Haven’t Heard Enough about the iPad Already

Apple’s big hype around the iPad may have backfired on them somewhat.  The iPhone it is not.  In fact, a week or so after the iPad launched, it has more than its share of critics and detractors.  An article in eWeek opines:

But after the hype wears off and we take an honest look at the iPad, we quickly find that there are some major flaws with the company’s tablet device that it just doesn’t want us to know about. When a consumer picks up the iPad expecting a top-of-the-line experience, they might be surprised to learn that it can’t quite provide that.”


Uh oh.  So what’s wrong with the iPad, or what just not right with it?  An interesting study by Retrevo found that the more people know about the iPad, the less they want to buy one.  After all the hype and excitement, this is disappointing.  And that’s really the problem.  It’s not the iPad per se (or maybe it is) but it’s the fact that it was an earth-shattering product.  Eighty percent of the survey’s respondents had heard about the iPad before its launch, and 25 percent said they weren’t interested in buying it.  After the launch, that doubled to 50 percent.

What is wrong with the iPad.  Google that very question, and you’ll get an onslaught of opinions.  But one of the big things is that it does not support Adobe Flash, and without that a lot of web content is not able to be viewed.  An article in TechEd tells us, “That seems akin to taking a beautiful scenic drive down a coastline but being blocked from vast stretches of that view.  You’re welcome to read the scenic vista descriptions, but the whales are represented by a symbol only.”  Maybe not the best way to experience the web as Apple would lead us to believe it is.


PC World identified a few features that the iPad lacks that could have made it live up to the insane hype:  Flash, camera, chat, video and HDMI, a bigger aspect ratio, wireless sync, handwriting recognition, a brand new interface, multitasking, and a few more.  This really does illustrate the problem: we expected too much, and what is a perfectly fine device is getting a lot of flack.

But what is the iPad perfectly fine for?  It is a great e-reader; it could be the best e-reader.  It could be a huge boon for educational use – allowing school children to access material, and college kids to save money on text books.  And not have to carry 800 pounds of paper around on any given day. The potential applications are great.  The iPad is good at what it does, but it doesn’t do what we think it should.

More Music News From Around the Web . . .

eMusicBlast Promises Pro A&R Feeedback For $49

Toro Y Moi: BeatCrave Fav

Bonnaroo 2010 Lineup