Bookmark and Share Bookmark this
ADVANCED SEARCH    

Music, Sound Effects, Tech News, and More — The AudioMicro Blog

Xylote.com Launches a New Sample Pack Included in the Super Discount Bundle

1231821 music babylon   1 Xylote.com Launches a New Sample Pack Included in the Super Discount Bundle

Enjoy a new sample pack of free royalty music from Xylote.com, featuring 10 sample packs. The Super Discount Bundle will be available for 14 days only, and includes a unique package full of sounds, samples, construction kits, royalty-free music loops and sound effects for creative music producers, aspiring DJs, web designers and individuals in the film industry.

The Super Discount Bundle is available for download with only 30 credits and features titles like Urbanstrasse, Modern Kits for PRH, Web Series, Crazy Humans, Nuclear Fx and more.

Some features include: Urbanstrasse, which is a mixture of Hip Hop and R&B. Choose from eight different professional construction kits that are ready to use from 85 to 120 BPM over 75 new percussion sounds, 5 EXS Drum Kits and 30 drum loops; music Loops over 170 music loops that are ready to use from 5 to 57 seconds long in the following genres — Jazz, Hip Hop/R&B, Techno, House, Orchestral, Pop, Acoustic, Eurodance, Minimal, Film/Action, Electronic, D&B, Medieval, Pop Rap and more. Producer beats include 538 professional drum loops compatible with software like ACID Pro, Pro Tools, SONAR, GarageBand, Nuendo, Logic, Cubase, Reason, Digital Performer, Session, Sequel, Live, FL Studio. Also enjoy 50 different and unique sound effects of human sounds, which were recorded with 24-bit technology for an incredible stereo sound, and 160 spoken word sound effects featuring numbers, days of the week, surround speakers, and the alphabet letters from A to Z.

You can easily listen and download every sound from the entire library available on this bundle pack at Xylote.com.  You can also choose to download samples, pro audio loops, royalty free music for YouTube videos, music loops for web templates, button sounds and much more.

Xylote.com is a web-based company that was built on futuristic ideas, matching a large variety of styles and sound effects from the smallest clicks/buttons for web utilities to sci-fi/drones and special effects for film productions.  Professional producers carefully selected each available selection, with an extensive background in creating original music for almost any type of music projects from jingles to commercial music and sound for picture.

Posted in: , ,

The Premium Collection – 13,000 New Production Music Tracks

royalty free music,royalty free music,sound effects free sound effects,stock music,sound bits

We have just added over 13,000 record label owned, production music tracks to AudioMicro. The new offering is being called “The Premium Collection“. Historically, this entire collection has only been available to major television networks and feature film producers in a rights managed licensing format. We are please to offer this material to you and hope that you will enjoy all the great new tracks. All Premium Collection Tracks have a special flag that appears in search and browse results to let you know that you are listening to premium material. Please note that with this great new collection carries a more limited, royalty free music license. The main restriction is that the tracks cannot be used on network / cable television or in any project with a budget over fifty thousand dollars. For full license details, please be sure to check out the Premium Content License Agreement. If you need to use tracks in a manner outside the scope of the Premium Content License Agreement, our standard collection is still available with over 24,000 tracks and suitable for nearly any audio visual production imaginable.

Posted in: , , , , , , ,

55,000+ New Sound Effects by The Hollywood Edge Now Available

The Hollywood Edge

Big News! We have just added over 55,000 new sound effects from The Hollywood Edge, the world’s most widely used sound effect library.   These sound effects were created by the Academy Award-winning sound studio Soundelux, whose credits include such films as Kill Bill, Braveheart, and Fast and Furious.  The Hollywood Edge and Soundelux are part of the CSS Studios group of companies. CSS Studios is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discovery Communications (NASDAQ: DISCA) and provides creative services to major motion picture studios, independent producers, broadcast networks, cable channels, and advertising agencies. CSS services are marketed under the brand names Todd-AO, Sound One, Soundelux, POP Sound, Modern Music, and The Hollywood Edge. This content partnership is a big step forward for AudioMicro and brings our total track count to over 150,000 and growing.

In addition to our superb collection of user-generated content, we can now deliver, on-demand, thousands of sounds created by the world’s most talented sound professionals.  Our users should be impressed with the unprecedented quality, size and scope of The Hollywood Edge collection.  Under the terms of a new licensing agreement, our members have access to The Hollywood Edge’s library of professional-grade sound effects royalty free and under the same pricing and terms as our user generated, crowd-sourced sound effects. Prices for individual sound effects are as little as $1 per minute, while subscription packages start at just $9 per month.  End users are permitted to use the content for all digital media, including websites, short online films, motion pictures, feature films, flash animations, radio advertisings, PowerPoint presentations, live performance, remixes and other purposes.  Historically, The Hollywood Edge library has been available only in the form of large sound effects packages on hard drives, CD’s and DVD’s and aimed at the professional market.

For additional details on the deal, check out the full sound effect press release here.  Thanks again for your support as we continue on our quest to be the web’s leading stock audio distributor.

Posted in: , , ,

Sound effects change our perception of the world

l 5fbe9c1b29fd4356a5e18b8d26d9fcdb Sound effects change our perception of the world

We’ve all seen rough and tumble fight scenes or screeching shoot-em-up car chases in movies. But it’s what you don’t see that really makes these scenes so emotionally compelling.

It all comes down to sound effects. It might seem like a less-than-astute observation, but oftentimes we forget that what we’re hearing is something added after the fact by foley artists. Especially when it comes to animated films, where every sound needs to be created from scratch.

The Cognitive Daily science blog wrote about this phenomenon back in 2007, and they have some interesting examples of actual scientific studies on this topic.  But having recently re-watched Terminator 2: Judgment Day, a film with notably complex sound design, it got me thinking about how important sound effects are in film, TV and the media — The film won two Oscars for sound design and sound effects editing in 1991.

For instance, check out this guy’s retooling of the famous Hindenberg disaster. The original footage was silent, but he adds stock sound effects and Herb Morrison’s news report of the incident. The result is an emotionally compelling piece of news footage that, though containing unoriginal audio aspects, more clearly conveys the horror of that fateful day.

One of my favorite skits from the show “Whose Line Is It Anyway,” is when they pick people out of the audience to provide sound effects for a couple of the players. Compare that to when they have one of the players do sound effects. Quite a different experience.

Also, in honor of our recently deceased King of Pop, here is a (somewhat stupid) reworking of Michael Jackson’s “Bad” video with added sound effects.

Michael Jackson Bad (added sound effects)

The addition of “boing” sounds here and there distract from the song and make the video seem sillier than it really is.

It’s funny how sometimes when you really think about it, the most obvious things can surprise you.

Posted in: , , , , , , , , ,

Sound Tracks Utilizing Stock Music and Sound Effects from AudioMicro

Curious to see the AudioMicro sound library in action? Check out a few videos samples that incorporate music and sound effects from our library. Examples include movie scores, professional presentations, promotional videos, and personal slide shows.  Enjoy!

And here are a few links from around the web.

If you like motorcycles, you’ll enjoy this one…

The making of California Balloons, a short film about French spies…

A personal travel video about a trip to the beach…

A Trip to the Beach from Kerri Sheehan on Vimeo.

Support your favorite charity….

and last but not least, from Equal, the makers of LonelyGirl15, one of the most popular YouTube video series’ of all time…

Posted in: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This Week In Copyright Infringement – Project Playlist Banned By MySpace & Facebook

This week was an interesting one in the world of copyright infringement, takedown notices, and websites that choose to “do what they want” when it comes to record label material.  Early in the week, we learned that MySpace had removed Project Playlist widgets from all MySpace profiles that contained the popular music playlist compiler.  At the time, it was presumed that Facebook might not remove the Project Playlist application from and would attempt to stand up to the record labels and defend the startup.  However, just a few days later, Facebook caved in under pressure of litigation from the labels, and removed the Project Playlist service as well.   Of particular importance to all this is to note the just one day prior to being removed from Faceboook, Project Playlist was able to secure a deal with Sony BMG which allows music from the label giant to legally be used in the service.  

Project playlist is gaining popularity and all of this bad press is undoubtedly fantastic exposure for the service.  If they are unable to close deals with WMG, EMI, and UMG, will the service be able to survive with only Sony on board?  The labels are clearly in control here, and the fate of this startup hangs in their hands.

The popularity of the service seems natural – it allows users to listen to music on demand, for free.  Advertisements are used to support the service; however, the effectiveness of music advertisements is a huge question mark, leading advertisers to demand a greatly reduced CPM.  While listening to the music, users are typically performing other activities other than starting at the ads.  Web users can have different tabs and windowns open, or altogether not be using their computer monitor whatsoever.

The music industry is undergoing a major change and it’s quite clear the the model of 2008 and 2009 is free, yet ad supported music.  Is this a perfect solution?  Will it lead to increased revenues for the labels?  Will it be enough to compensate for the decline in CD sales?  Eventually, they will get it right and the musical advertisement may be a great step in the right direction.  So long as you do not mind staring at Fruit of the Loom ads while you jam out to Queen, the ad supported model will be able to deliver your on demand music needs.  So who will win this space? MySpace Music, Project Playlist, Pandora, LastFM, or another service?

Posted in: , , , , , , , , ,

Michael Arrington re-states his position that “music will be free”

TechCrunch founder and CEO Michael Arrington, a top web writer, debater, and all things startup, wrote a nice post about 360 music deals this week.  Towards the end of the post he goes on to restate a position he has been advocating for well over a year now, that “Recorded Music will be Free“.  The year old post links to other bloggers that take contrary opinions of his post, including Paul Glazowski of Profy.com.

Mr. Arrington may be right in his position, he may not be.  Nevertheless, it’s a position worth debating.  For clarifcation, AudioMicro interprets Arrington’s prediction to be that “music will be totally free for everyone to download and use in a personal manner but that it will be supported through an advertising model”.  This is an interesting opinion, we think he’s “partially right”.  Now, let’s give him due credit – Michael Arrington is a very wise man and not a single thing we can say or ever will say will be a better opinion that his.  He is a master debater, attorney, and phenominal writer and he has undoubtedly built a media empire over at TechCrunch – we are avid readers of the site and it’s biased, yet well founded opinions.  That being said, AudioMicro shall attempt to break down Mr. Arrington’s opinion by offering some biased points of our own.

For the past 12 years or so, music has already been free (free if you want to “steal” it, that is).  Therefore, the notion that music “will be free” seems to be stating the obvious.  Anyone with half a brain and an internet connection for the past 12 years has been able to get any song and any album from the file sharing services and this rapid theft shows no slowdown as services like BitTorrent are more popular than ever.  

Just as music is already free to those who choose to steal is, so is every single other type of digital content, including software, photography, movies, books, and journalism.  If it’s not free through outright piracy, the content is free through a promotion, trial, hack, torrent, or business model (e.g. a startup company that has realized that they can take market share – aka shrink markets – by offering content for free where the larger, more established players make you pay for it).  

Journalism (aka “The News”) is already free, on the internet at least.  Nobody in their right mind should pay to read internet news / blogs and nobody does pay for these services (at least nobody under age 40 that’s aware of “free content”).  News outlets simply offer a product for free (news and opinions and quite oftern opinions disguised as news) and then sell advertising across the content to support the business.  Perhaps it is just plain obvious that a blogger would advocate that music should “really be free, yet ad supported” is because that is the model that they already operate their businesses under – giving the content away for free and slapping advertising all over it.

So why do people pay for still pay for content when it’s already free and the ramifications of copyright infringement are so small and unenforcable to outweigh the benefits of saving money and getting the product you desire?  Why is the photography licensing industry a $2 billion industry if photos are free through creative commons licenses?  How does Warner Music Group (WMG), even in an awful stock market, maintain a market capitalization of $571 million (as of the time of this post)?  How is this possible if WMG is doomed to be a “musical advertisement”.  Clearly, people still do pay for music and they will continue to pay for music, but why?

When it comes to personal use music, AudioMicro feels that Arrington is certainly onto something; however, when it comes to commercial use, we know that people are paying for music, and appropriately securing synchronization rights for music used in their audio-visual projects.  Sync licensing is the nature of our business here at AudioMicro, and we continue to see increased revenues from the licensing of music for commercial use.  Performance and Synchronization are the two areas that seem to be immune to any attack of “free music”.  AudioMicro is a business built upon the fundamentals that stealing (or making unauthorized use of) digital content is not the right thing to do and that nobody benefits from piracy.  

Contrary to personal use music sites that can be ad supported, it’s difficult, if not impossible, to place advertisements within music used for commercial purposes.  You can make television free, yet ad supported by forcing users to watch advertisements and you can even give photos away through ad supported models like PicApp; however, you can not just give music away and run an advertisement over it and you certainly cannot place music containing advertisements into a films, animations, podcasts, websites, or other video productions.  If you are an artist worried about the decline in personal use music revenues as a result of free, yet ad supported music models emerging, we encourage you to join the growing crowd of micro stock music artists here at AudioMicro that are earning cash from sync fees and the attachment of music to a growing variety of visual media.  

Posted in: , , , , , , , ,

For anyone concerned about selling their music on AudioMicro.com…

I’m a successful songwriter/composer who recently found out about AudioMicro, and became so enamored with the concept that I now am their Artist Recruiting Manager. In the past few weeks I’ve been talking to a lot of fellow musicians about AudioMicro, and the micro stock platform in general. There seems to be some mixed feelings and some misunderstandings about how artists fit into the whole micro stock picture.

For those who aren’t fully aware of the concept, micro stock simply means that the content (in this case audio/music) is crowd sourced – meaning ANYONE can submit content – and it’s sold for prices starting at $1 (in this case it’s $1 per minute of music). A few of my composer friends who make some decent money selling tracks for $30 or so in the royalty free space feel that micro stocking audio is going to devalue their music. It’s an understandable point of view, but in my humble opinion, a limited perspective.

See, whenever and wherever anything is sold, there is always the option of spending money on the high-end, or brand name version of the product, or the “generic” version of the product. If you use laundry detergent as an example, there is usually a few dollar difference between Tide and the generic brand, even though the ingredients are EXACTLY the same and we actually feel – sometimes better in the case of crowd sourced content.  Both brands make money and flourish because there will always be a market for both. Some people want to spend more money for the flashy brand, and some just want something that works regardless of the name or package. Sure you may make $30 or more by selling your music on a royalty free basis, but can it hurt you to open your “product” up to a consumer base that would rather spend less than that? Not at all in my opinion. People will still pay $30 for your music in that world just as fast people will spend a few bucks for your music in the micro stock world. You’re basically just opening up your customer base (the millions that can’t and won’t license audio for $30 a track) and creating new ways to make money by doing it. Not to mention the “theives” out there who only steal music — they’d also gladly pay $1 or 2 for music — it’s the same principle that has made iTunes so successful and has made people forget about scouring the internet for free music.

And above all, its risk free! At least take a handful of your tracks that haven’t ever earned a penny, and stick it up on this site. If you don’t like the way it works, just request to take em down. The artist has 100% ownership of their content and can remove it at any time.

In addition, AudioMicro offers the best royalty rate i’ve ever seen – 50% of every track sold.  As AudioMicro takes off, artists will be in position to make more money than ever before. When this site becomes the one-stop shop for stock audio, its not far fetched to think that many an artist could easily be making hundreds or even thousands of dollars a month, just in micro stock.

I can see how this will be the wave of the future, and as much as some musicians will resist the change, its the natural progression of things. Check out what has happened in the photography world and you’ll be amazed at how easy it is to find content, and how easy it is to make money from your art. Micro stock opens up opportunities for artists that never existed before, and makes it so much easier for those who need to place music in their visual medium. It’s the perfect give and take for both sides – its about as democratic as it gets. I see it as having your cake and eating it too – continue to sell some of your music for as much as you can. Take advantage of the high end and also upon up your content to an entirely new class of customer with micro stock. But while you’re plcaing tracks directly with high end customers you can put the rest of your stuff here on AudioMicro and make some extra money on the side and get a feel for the ease in which the micro stock concept works – for everyones benefit. We see some folks making over $100k per year in royalties in the micro stock photo realm and there’s no reason why this can’t be the case in the music space, which is actually a larger market than photos. It will just take some time for the concept to take off, but being there ahead of the curve will give you a huge advantage.

Thats my two cents. I’ve looked at other stock music sites, and AudioMicro is by far the most artist friendly, easiest to navigate, and the music upload process is a breeze. Not to mention that other sites offer only a measly 20% royalty rate or the ones that want you to “share your content for free” under a creative commons license or some other format. I applaud AudioMicro for seeing the future and trying to make sure that artists out there are well aware of the new market shift ahead of the curve and we encourage artists to jump on board and take advantage of the revolution rather than being resistant and scared of it.

Sincerely,

Gideon Black, Artist Recruiting Manager
www.audiomicro.com
Los Angeles, CA
Phone:  (818) 849-6396 
Fax: (320) 451-3838

Posted in: , , , , , ,

Micro Stock = The Future of Content Licensing

Rights Managed Licensing is on the decline. Royalty Free Licensing is stabilizing (aka “not growing”). Ad supported Licensing models (aka the YouTube way) are proving unmonetizable / unprofitable as well as distracting to viewers in addition to not providing royalties to the content creators / providers among other copyright infringement issues. A new buzz is around CPM / Pay Per Use Licensing. We like to call this new form of licensing “same product, different packaging, everybody gets screwed”. With CPM licensing, a user of content (let’s say a photography, video, or audio clips) pays a fee every time the content is viewed/heard. What ends up happening is that the publisher pays more for the content, the content creator gets a smaller royalty for their work (as the CPM facilitator takes a hefty cut of the action) and the customer is “eternally billed” and tracked for their usage of the content. The truth is that Micro Stock is the future of content licensing. Micro Stock creates entirely new content from new artists, the content is nearly identical to the high end “professional” rights managed content, it gives customers a simple, easy to understand, general use commercial license with no additional billings, and it pays a nice, healthy royalty to it’s content creators. Micro Stock is powerful, it’s taken down an entire $6 billion public company and made it into a $2 billion company. Micro stock is on pace to double in terms of it’s popularity / growth / quantity of content licensed in this manner, over the next 5 years. Micro Stock is here to stay!

Posted in: , , , , , , ,